Experience
Where rules, models and evidence had to stand up
Drawn from real work in regulated firms and the public sector. Client work is confidential, so every case here is illustrative: anonymised and reconstructed, with the details changed so no firm can be identified. Financial crime comes first, because that is where this business started; the rest is the same discipline applied to calculations, models, public-sector data and automated decisions that had to be explained when questioned.
For build work, our five steps run in order (Discovery, Design, Build, Deploy & test, Assure & hand over). Reviews of existing controls focus instead on assessment, documented gaps and findings. See how we build for the delivery path.
How we build →If one of these looks like the problem in front of you — Discuss your situation
From the cases to the automations
These are the situations. Checks that came out of work like this are built and running.
Every case above was work that had to survive being read by somebody with a reason to doubt it. What came out of that work is a body of automated checks over the records a firm already holds — each one reading those records, reaching a documented conclusion, and refusing to reach one where the evidence is missing.
They are shown by invitation rather than published, because every example in them is constructed and a synthetic case read out of context reads as a real one. Ask, and you will be walked through the ones that match your rules.
Discuss your situation
Each case here is the same standard holding under scrutiny — your rules, models and decisions can hold too
A short discussion is usually enough to determine whether the issue is one of rule design, control, evidence, or a combination of the three — and what it would take to put right.